When Your Pipeline Outpaces Your People: The Workforce Planning Gap in Preconstruction
Why disconnected pursuit and project data is a strategic vulnerability your workforce planning can't afford.
January 7, 2026
8
min read

Imagine that your BD team just won a $45mm healthcare project three weeks ahead of schedule. Except your operations team finds out via email the morning after contract signing. They scramble to check availability, realize your best superintendent is tied up for another six months, and now you're piecing together a B-team for an A-list client.
Meanwhile, your pipeline is packed with hundreds of millions in active pursuits, but nobody can answer the simple question: "Do we have the right people to actually build these projects if we win them?"
This is the workforce planning gap. And it's costing general contractors millions in missed opportunities, inefficient resource allocation, and operational chaos.
The Numbers Behind the Crisis
According to the Construction Labor Market Analyzer (CLMA), construction labor costs account for 20% to 40% of total project costs, making workforce planning one of the most critical factors in project profitability. Yet most general contractors still manage this crucial function through disconnected spreadsheets and reactive staffing decisions.
The workforce shortage makes planning even more critical:
- The construction industry needs approximately 499,000 new workers in 2026 just to meet demand (Associated Builders and Contractors projections)
- 92% of contractors report difficulty filling open positions (AGC workforce survey, 2025)
- 45% of firms attribute project delays directly to worker shortages
- Ineffective information handover between construction phases contributes to an estimated $2.1 trillion in lost value globally every year
When your pursuit pipeline and workforce planning operate in silos, you're actively working against your own growth. Many times, a general contractor's annual revenue growth is directly stunted by their inability to have clear communication between business development and operations.
Why the Gap Exists: Three Systemic Failures
Failure #1: Business Development and Operations Live in Different Worlds
Business development pursues opportunities based on market potential and client relationships. Operations plans resources based on current commitments and near-term forecasts. The two teams rarely have visibility into each other's realities until it's too late.
The result: BD wins a project operations wasn't ready for, or ops has bench capacity while BD isn't aware of the bandwidth for new pursuits. When people are sitting on your bench for any period of time, it's directly eating away at your profit pool.
Failure #2: Workforce Planning Happens After Go/No-Go Decisions
According to workforce management research, most GCs make pursuit decisions based on gut feel about capacity rather than data-driven insights into actual workforce availability.
When workforce planning isn't integrated into the pursuit process, firms routinely:
- Pursue projects they don't have capacity to execute
- Pass on opportunities they actually could staff with strategic planning
- Discover resource conflicts weeks after contract signing
- Lose visibility into long-term capacity for strategic growth planning
Failure #3: The "Spreadsheet Monster"
Multiple disconnected spreadsheets, ie., one for engineers, one for PMs, one for superintendents, one for active pursuits, create a data management nightmare.
The consequences:
- Critical decisions delayed while teams hunt for the "current version"
- Resource conflicts discovered too late to correct
- Double-booking of key personnel across pursuits
- Zero visibility into utilization rates or capacity forecasting
- Manual updates that introduce errors and become outdated within hours
The 5 Non-Negotiables for Integrated Workforce Planning
These five capabilities separate reactive staffing from strategic workforce planning:
1. Real-Time Pipeline-to-Capacity Visibility
Operations teams need to see "likely-to-win" projects in the pipeline, not just awarded contracts. This allows proactive recruiting and resource allocation before mobilization becomes urgent.
When project teams can join the bidding process early because leadership already knows who's available, they walk into projects with full context rather than scrambling at the last minute.
For more info on visibility, be sure to check out our comprehensive guide on workforce forecasting.
2. Workforce-Informed Go/No-Go Decisions
According to Buildr's analysis of construction workforce integration, workforce forecasting should be an integral part of the Go/No-Go process, not an afterthought once a contract is signed.
Rather than relying on feelings or vague ideas about who might be available ("We'll figure it out..."), leadership needs real-time data on assignment schedules to make informed decisions about capacity.
3. Cross-Departmental Access Without Per-User Penalties
Effective workforce planning requires visibility across all stakeholders—from BD to estimating to operations to field leadership. Per-seat pricing models kill this collaboration because firms must constantly weigh whether adding another user justifies the cost. This is why Buildr will always offer unlimited seats and data.
4. Automated Data Flow Between Pursuit and Project Phases
Manual handoffs between preconstruction and operations introduce delays, errors, and critical information loss. Integration should be automatic and bi-directional, creating a bridge between preconstruction, pursuits, and operations that fundamentally changes how firms plan. No more spreadsheets that have an unknown number of iterations; everyone is pulling from the same synced data.
To learn more about how we think about combining project and pursuit data pools, be sure to check out our blog on redefining preconstruction excellence.
5. Utilization Tracking That Informs Strategic Decisions
According to construction workforce management research from industry analysts, accurate utilization reporting is essential for ensuring teams use time effectively and identifying when personnel are over- or under-allocated.
Real-time visibility enables strategic decisions like recognizing when a project has three engineers assigned but only needs two after completing the submittal phase—allowing immediate reallocation to projects that need support.
To read more, check out our blog on workforce utilization.

Why Most Workforce Planning Software Misses the Mark
The workforce planning market is crowded, but most solutions fall into three categories that fail to solve the preconstruction integration problem:
Field-First Time Tracking Tools: Excel at GPS attendance and jobsite labor management, but lack integration with pursuit data. They're built for executing projects, not planning them.
HR-Focused Workforce Management Platforms: Handle payroll, benefits, and compliance well, but aren't connected to your project pipeline or pursuit strategy.
Standalone Resource Planning Tools: Offer sophisticated scheduling but exist as isolated systems disconnected from your CRM, forcing teams to manually duplicate information—creating the same "monster spreadsheet" problem in software form.
HB Construction's COO Travis Coker spoke to the monster spreadsheet issue in our customer story: "We looked at [industry-leading workforce software] but it was just a glorified spreadsheet. The cost didn't justify scheduling that wasn't even tied to project data like Buildr is."
The Only Sustainable Solution: Native Integration
According to construction technology integration experts, the most effective workforce planning happens when pursuit data and resource allocation exist in a single, unified platform—not through awkward integrations or manual data syncing.
What "Native Integration" Actually Means
Pursuit data automatically flows to workforce planning: When an opportunity moves to "Likely to Win," operations can immediately begin staffing scenarios. No manual transfer required.
Go/No-Go decisions incorporate real-time capacity: Leadership can see workforce availability directly within the pursuit record, making informed decisions about bandwidth before committing resources.
Project awards trigger seamless handoffs: The transition from pursuit to active project includes all estimating assumptions, key relationships, and pre-planned resource allocations. This eliminates the "operations learns via email" problem.
Pipeline visibility informs recruiting strategy: When you can see what's likely to close in Q3, you can start specialized recruiting in Q1. Now you're not scrambling in week one of project mobilization.
The Questions Every GC Should Ask
If you're evaluating your current workforce planning approach, ask yourself these diagnostic questions:
About Your Current Process:
- Can your operations team see what's in the pursuit pipeline before contracts are signed?
- Do Go/No-Go decisions incorporate real data about workforce availability?
- When you win a project, how long does it take to communicate resource requirements to operations?
- Can your leadership team answer "What's our capacity for Q3?" with actual data?
About Integration:
5. Does your CRM talk to your workforce planning system, or are they completely separate?
6. Can BD see operational capacity constraints when pursuing opportunities?
7. When pursuit data changes, do workforce plans update automatically?
About Strategic Impact:
8. Have you ever won work you didn't have capacity to execute well?
9. Have you passed on opportunities because you assumed you lacked capacity without actually checking?
10. Does your recruiting strategy align with your likely-to-win pipeline?
If you answered "no" or "I don't know" to more than half of these questions, you have a workforce planning gap.
The Path Forward
The construction industry is facing a structural labor shortage that won't resolve quickly. With 499,000 workers needed in 2026 alone, the firms that thrive won't be those that hire the most. They'll be those that plan the smartest.
Integration between pursuit planning and workforce allocation isn't a luxury feature. It's table stakes for any GC serious about strategic growth.
The workforce planning gap isn't just an operational inefficiency. It's a strategic vulnerability costing you opportunities, profitability, and competitive advantage every single day.
Ready to close the gap? See how integrated preconstruction and workforce planning can transform your capacity for growth. Book a demo with Buildr today.
Stay in the loop.
Get the latest expert insights, tips, and updates on preconstruction, business development, estimating, and more — delivered straight to your inbox.
Stay in the loop.
Get the latest expert insights, tips, and updates on preconstruction, business development, estimating, and more — delivered straight to your inbox.

